Dog's Mouth Ivory Series II: Where is the pain point of Industrial Internet of Things?

Internet of Things pain points

The previous chapter of the dog's mouth ivory series: The ultimate cloud on the device? Http://, why so many years, everyone is not on the cloud? Some big companies have already started this process ten years ago, but they have suffered injuries one after another. I have met several families who have entered three or three regressions. This is similar to the EPR and MES systems of the 1990s.


What caused the device cloud to look beautiful but injures countless people? Especially in recent years, a large number of IoT platforms have flocked to incomplete statistics. At present, the well-known Internet of Things tells the many benefits of the equipment factory's Shangyun, with over 300 platforms already in existence, and other or in full swing. Those who are just around the corner do not count, and there are as many as five national names. According to my old-eyed dog eyes, most of them are cannon ash.


Why do you say that?

It is because most of the current warriors who entered the Shura Field come from the IT industry, or carry deep self-learning, braveness of the neural network, or rely on the residual heat of artificial intelligence in 2017, hoping that they can take down the conservative industrial Internet at one stroke. Industry, open up equipment, MES, ERP, e-commerce, a generation of great achievements.

Unfortunately, the industrial sector is extremely fragmented and the terrain is complex. There are thousands of different types of equipment in a single industry. In addition to this industry, the world's most unparalleled industry - industrial automation, not to mention the standard programming language IEC61131-3 have a few kinds of dialects, communication protocol can be considered that there is no standard. Those so-called international standards and national standards occupy only a few percent of the land.


As far back as the 1990s, the IEC 61158 International Fieldbus Standards Committee made a great wish in front of the gods to unify the industrial field bus and unify the process control, discrete control, building control, electricity, and petrochemical all the agreements. The result was that it took more than a decade, the final retreat, and the narrowing of the scope to the process control of a segment of the market, but there are still eight sets of agreements were selected as international standards, the chairman of the day fieldbus standards committee announced resignation, he said : All are standards, meaning that there is no standard, and my job has failed! Very good this guy is a responsible person, no more than two years, IEC61158 increased to 13 sets of international standard bus, and now there should be 11 sets of agreements.


This has not finished yet. Other manufacturers that have not been selected as international standards have started their own business. They have also established communication standards for a number of sub-sectors, including building, transport control, and electric power. The number of field buses known as international standards is not less than one hundred. There are many species, and the self-proclaimed standards set by the manufacturers themselves are vast oceans. I have not controlled development for 20 years, and I have established no fewer than 10 sets of so-called standards. Several sets are still in use today. Chao Shi Tianchai refueling is not lively!


Wow a pass, here we take a look at the pain points of the device cloud:


1. Difficult to develop: A set of equipment cloud, need to understand the process, understand the control, understand the cloud server back-end development, understand the front-end development, understand APP development, a company knows so much almost, even if there is also need 6,7 individuals toss for more than half a year, but not necessarily how long it can take;


2. Access difficulty: dozens of signals, hundreds of communication protocols, even if the agreement is the same, the location of this variable storage is still different, this is the so-called industry statute in Germany is not defined;


3. Analysis is difficult: There are many types of equipment. There are many different manufacturers, different designs, different variables, and different analysis methods for the same equipment. It is not an IT staff who understands it.


4. Maintenance Difficulty: The equipment factory must recruit an IT team that understands the craftsmanship of the industry to ensure the management and maintenance of the later stage; plus the controller is a brand, a DTU brand, a software gang interface, once broken, The equipment factory can only send engineers to the door to toss, not only because it is not easy, but it costs a lot more.


5. High cost: After reading the first four items, no one can open tens of millions, even if it is completed in the later period also requires a lot of maintenance costs.


How to do?


Scan the small program QR code above or search for the equipment bank in the WeChat applet, and register the equipment bank to see how the equipment cloud is refreshed!


The article is original, please indicate the source!

Public number: Old Dog Technology (LG123321yun)

For inquiries or suggestions, please contact Micro Signal





Ningbo Autrends International Trade Co.,Ltd. , https://www.supervapebar.com